vit-base-patch16-224 vs nsfw-image-detection-384
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
google · A · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
14.0 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Marqo · B · Open weights
Params
5.6 M
Context
—
30d
406 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | vit-base-patch16-224 | nsfw-image-detection-384 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 5.6 M |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 14,014,786 | 406,136 |
| Downloads all time | 198.3 M | 14.9 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-03-02 | 2024-11-20 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
14.1 M222 K
vit-base-patch16-224
nsfw-image-detection-384
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
nsfw-image-detection-384 · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
vit-base-patch16-224 · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB