nsfw_image_detection vs vit-base-patch16-224
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 20 September 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | nsfw_image_detection | vit-base-patch16-224 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 90 M |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | ViTForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 3,350,872 | 7,177,062 |
| Downloads all time | 1.4 B | 182.7 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-10-13 | 2022-03-02 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 55 days (28 Jul – 20 Sep)
7.2 M3.4 M
nsfw_image_detection
vit-base-patch16-224
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
nsfw_image_detection · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
vit-base-patch16-224 · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit-base-patch16-224
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs nsfw_image_detection
vit-base-patch16-224 vs gender-classification
vit-base-patch16-224 vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs fairface_age_image_detection
vit-base-patch16-224 vs vit-base-nsfw-detector