mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit-base-patch16-224
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k | vit-base-patch16-224 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 0 M | 90 M |
| Architecture | — | ViTForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 18,493,856 | 4,662,041 |
| Downloads all time | 1.1 B | 172.9 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-12-16 | 2022-03-02 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
19.1 M4.5 M
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
vit-base-patch16-224 · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs nsfw_image_detection
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs fairface_age_image_detection
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs resnet50.a1_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs resnet18.a1_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs mit-b2