swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256 vs nsfw-image-detection-384
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
microsoft · A · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
372 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Marqo · B · Open weights
Params
5.6 M
Context
—
30d
406 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256 | nsfw-image-detection-384 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | 5.6 M |
| Architecture | Swinv2ForImageClassification | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 372,140 | 406,136 |
| Downloads all time | 11.4 M | 14.9 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | — | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-06-14 | 2024-11-20 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
437 K222 K
swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
nsfw-image-detection-384
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
nsfw-image-detection-384 · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs nsfw-image-detection-384
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
vit-base-patch16-224 vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256 vs Gender-Classifier-Mini
resnet18.a1_in1k vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256