vit-base-patch16-224 vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | vit-base-patch16-224 | swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | — |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | Swinv2ForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 7,262,445 | 393,760 |
| Downloads all time | 183.0 M | 11.0 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | — |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-03-02 | 2022-06-14 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 56 days (28 Jul – 21 Sep)
7.3 M393 K
vit-base-patch16-224
swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
vit-base-patch16-224 · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit-base-patch16-224
nsfw_image_detection vs vit-base-patch16-224
vit-base-patch16-224 vs gender-classification
vit-base-patch16-224 vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs fairface_age_image_detection
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256