mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
timm · A · Open weights
Params
2.6 M
Context
—
30d
12.7 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
microsoft · B · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
390 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k | swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 2.6 M | — |
| Architecture | — | Swinv2ForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 12,669,850 | 390,252 |
| Downloads all time | 1.2 B | 11.6 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | — |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-12-16 | 2022-06-14 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
22.3 M369 K
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k
swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs resnet18.a1_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit-base-patch16-224
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs MegaDescriptor-T-224
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs deit_tiny_patch16_224.fb_in1k