Z-Image-Lora vs Cosmos3-Super-Text2Image-4Step
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 23 September 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Lora | Cosmos3-Super-Text2Image-4Step |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 6.2 B | 64.0 B |
| Architecture | — | Cosmos3ForConditionalGeneration |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | other |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Unknown |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 233,281 | 67,525 |
| Downloads all time | 1.8 M | 102 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-12-01 | 2026-07-07 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
355 K21 K
Z-Image-Lora
Cosmos3-Super-Text2Image-4Step
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Z-Image-Lora · fp16
114.5 GB / 24 GB
Cosmos3-Super-Text2Image-4Step · fp16
154.6 GB / 24 GB