Z-Image-Lora vs Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Lora | Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 6.2 B | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 233,281 | 1,052,576 |
| Downloads all time | 1.8 M | 1.8 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-12-01 | 2025-12-21 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
1.1 M49 K
Z-Image-Lora
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.5 GB / 24 GB
Z-Image-Lora · fp16
114.5 GB / 24 GB