vit-base-patch16-224 vs resnet-50
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
google · A · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
15.0 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | vit-base-patch16-224 | resnet-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 30 M |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | ResNetForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 15,008,966 | 211,700 |
| Downloads all time | 207.9 M | 574.7 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-03-02 | 2022-03-16 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
16.2 M212 K
vit-base-patch16-224
resnet-50
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
resnet-50 · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
vit-base-patch16-224 · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB