vit-base-patch16-224 vs edgenext_small.usi_in1k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
google · A · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
15.0 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | vit-base-patch16-224 | edgenext_small.usi_in1k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 10 M |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 15,008,966 | 271,478 |
| Downloads all time | 207.9 M | 8.6 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-03-02 | 2023-04-23 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
16.2 M185 K
vit-base-patch16-224
edgenext_small.usi_in1k
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
edgenext_small.usi_in1k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
vit-base-patch16-224 · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB