repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k vs vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
timm · B · Open weights
Params
10 M
Context
—
30d
274 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k | vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 10 M | 10 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 607,539 | 273,783 |
| Downloads all time | 3.6 M | 2.2 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-08-23 | 2022-12-23 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
799 K223 K
repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k
A overtook B on 4 Nov
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
resnet18.a1_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k
resnet18.a1_in1k vs vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k