tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k

Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.

timm · A

tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k

Params

20 M

Context

—

30d

1.6 M

apache-2.0 · commercial OK

timm · B

repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k

Params

10 M

Context

—

30d

669 K

mit · commercial OK

Specification comparison

Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.

Specification	tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k	repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
Parameters	20 M	10 M
Architecture	—	—
Context length	—	—
Licence	apache-2.0	mit
Commercial use	Allowed	Allowed
Languages	—	—
Downloads 30d	1,638,502	669,140
Downloads all time	9.5 M	1.8 M
Quantizations on the Hub	SAFETENSORS	SAFETENSORS
Gated	No	No
First seen on the Hub	2022-12-13	2023-08-23

Download trend

Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)

1.6 M669 K

tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k

VRAM side by side

On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted

repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k · fp16 0.5 GB / 24 GB

✅ Runs comfortably

tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k · fp16 0.6 GB / 24 GB

✅ Runs comfortably

Adjacent comparisons

mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k

mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k

resnet50.a1_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k

tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs mit-b2

nsfw_image_detection vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k

vit-base-patch16-224 vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k