repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k vs deit_tiny_patch16_224.fb_in1k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 14 October 2026.
timm · B · Open weights
Params
5.7 M
Context
—
30d
218 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k | deit_tiny_patch16_224.fb_in1k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 10 M | 5.7 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 609,204 | 217,808 |
| Downloads all time | 3.7 M | 3.0 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-08-23 | 2023-03-28 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (14 Aug – 11 Nov)
799 K206 K
repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
deit_tiny_patch16_224.fb_in1k
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
deit_tiny_patch16_224.fb_in1k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs deit_tiny_patch16_224.fb_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
resnet18.a1_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k
repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k vs Gender-Classifier-Mini