OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs QwQ-32B
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 8 September 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
31.3 B
Context
262,144
30d
212 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.3 B | 32.8 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | Qwen2ForCausalLM |
| Context length | 262,144 | 40,960 |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 212,019 | 193,789 |
| Downloads all time | 13.5 M | 3.5 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-07-23 | 2025-03-05 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 87 days (31 Jul – 25 Oct)
7.6 M194 K
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
QwQ-32B
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
QwQ-32B · fp16
77.5 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
290.0 GB / 24 GB