OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs JiRackUltra_14b
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 3 October 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
31.3 B
Context
262,144
30d
720 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
CMSManhattan · B · Open weights
Params
14.8 B
Context
131,072
30d
292 K
mit · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | JiRackUltra_14b |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.3 B | 14.8 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | Qwen2ForCausalLM |
| Context length | 262,144 | 131,072 |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | 13 |
| Downloads 30d | 720,422 | 291,904 |
| Downloads all time | 14.2 M | 1.0 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | GGUF, SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-07-23 | 2026-08-03 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
7.6 M165 K
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
JiRackUltra_14b
A overtook B on 29 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
JiRackUltra_14b · Q4_K_M
12.6 GB / 24 GB
JiRackUltra_14b · fp16 @ 128K ctx
68.4 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
290.0 GB / 24 GB