Z-Image-Turbo vs Juggernaut-XL-v9
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
RunDiffusion · B
Params
—
Context
—
30d
178 K
creativeml-openrail-m licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Turbo | Juggernaut-XL-v9 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 6.2 B | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | creativeml-openrail-m |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Conditional |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 1,116,826 | 177,723 |
| Downloads all time | 7.8 M | 6.6 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-11-25 | 2024-02-18 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
1.2 M162 K
Z-Image-Turbo
Juggernaut-XL-v9
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Juggernaut-XL-v9 · fp16
15.9 GB / 24 GB
Z-Image-Turbo · fp16
37.5 GB / 24 GB