Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs Z-Image-Turbo-FP8
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
unsloth · B · Open weights
Params
6.2 B
Context
—
30d
59 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF | Z-Image-Turbo-FP8 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | 6.2 B |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 1,052,576 | 58,772 |
| Downloads all time | 1.8 M | 59 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-12-21 | 2026-07-17 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
1.1 M37 K
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Z-Image-Turbo-FP8
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.5 GB / 24 GB
Z-Image-Turbo-FP8 · fp16
27.9 GB / 24 GB