Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs Pruna-Q-Image-2.1
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 23 October 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF | Pruna-Q-Image-2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | 7.1 B |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | other |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Unknown |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,061,074 | 515,394 |
| Downloads all time | 1.8 M | 515 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-12-21 | 2026-09-23 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 88 days (28 Jul – 23 Oct)
1.1 M49 K
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Pruna-Q-Image-2.1
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Pruna-Q-Image-2.1 · fp16
2.3 GB / 24 GB
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.5 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0 vs Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-Quantized vs Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-GGUF
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-Quantized vs Pruna-Q-Image-2.1
stable-diffusion-v1-5 vs Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF