Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs Juggernaut-X-v10
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
RunDiffusion · B · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
46 K
creativeml-openrail-m licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF | Juggernaut-X-v10 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | creativeml-openrail-m |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Conditional |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 1,052,576 | 46,181 |
| Downloads all time | 1.8 M | 641 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-12-21 | 2024-04-19 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
1.1 M16 K
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Juggernaut-X-v10
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.5 GB / 24 GB
Juggernaut-X-v10 · fp16
8.3 GB / 24 GB