Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs FLUX.2-klein-4B-mflux-4bit
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 25 October 2026.
Runpod · B · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
66 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF | FLUX.2-klein-4B-mflux-4bit |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,063,726 | 65,521 |
| Downloads all time | 1.9 M | 189 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-12-21 | 2026-02-16 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (28 Jul – 25 Oct)
1.1 M18 K
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
FLUX.2-klein-4B-mflux-4bit
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.5 GB / 24 GB
FLUX.2-klein-4B-mflux-4bit · fp16
5.6 GB / 24 GB