Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 23 October 2026.
unsloth · B · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
112 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF | ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,061,074 | 111,892 |
| Downloads all time | 1.8 M | 290 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2025-12-21 | 2026-04-14 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 88 days (28 Jul – 23 Oct)
1.1 M34 K
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF
ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.5 GB / 24 GB
ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.7 GB / 24 GB