vit_base_patch16_224.augreg2_in21k_ft_in1k vs efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
timm · A · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
402 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
timm · B · Open weights
Params
64 M
Context
—
30d
1.3 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | vit_base_patch16_224.augreg2_in21k_ft_in1k | efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 64 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 402,013 | 1,283,864 |
| Downloads all time | 18.3 M | 1.3 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-12-22 | 2023-11-21 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
1.3 M377 K
vit_base_patch16_224.augreg2_in21k_ft_in1k
efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k · fp16
0.8 GB / 24 GB
vit_base_patch16_224.augreg2_in21k_ft_in1k · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
vit-base-patch16-224 vs efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k
Gender-Classifier-Mini vs efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs vit_base_patch16_224.augreg2_in21k_ft_in1k
vit_base_patch16_224.augreg2_in21k_ft_in1k vs Gender-Classifier-Mini
nsfw_image_detection vs efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs efficientvit_l2.r288_in1k