tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 6 August 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k | vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 20 M | 10 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,638,502 | 431,768 |
| Downloads all time | 9.5 M | 2.2 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-12-13 | 2022-12-23 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 10 days (28 Jul – 6 Aug)
1.6 M363 K
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit_tiny_r_s16_p8_224.augreg_in21k
resnet50.a1_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs mit-b2
nsfw_image_detection vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k