tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs nsfw-image-detection-384
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
timm · A · Open weights
Params
20 M
Context
—
30d
1.9 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Marqo · B · Open weights
Params
5.6 M
Context
—
30d
406 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k | nsfw-image-detection-384 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 20 M | 5.6 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,925,326 | 406,136 |
| Downloads all time | 14.8 M | 14.9 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-12-13 | 2024-11-20 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
2.4 M222 K
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
nsfw-image-detection-384
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
nsfw-image-detection-384 · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs nsfw-image-detection-384
vit-base-patch16-224 vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs Gender-Classifier-Mini
resnet18.a1_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
resnet50.a1_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k