swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256 vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256 | efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | 10 M |
| Architecture | Swinv2ForImageClassification | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 393,760 | 12,697,960 |
| Downloads all time | 11.0 M | 36.8 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | — | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2022-06-14 | 2022-12-12 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 56 days (28 Jul – 21 Sep)
12.7 M249 K
swinv2-tiny-patch4-window16-256
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
resnet18.a1_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
efficientnet_b0.ra_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
repvgg_a0.rvgg_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k