sdxl-turbo vs NetaYume-Lumina-Image-2.0
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 20 September 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | sdxl-turbo | NetaYume-Lumina-Image-2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 2.6 B | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | other | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Unknown | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 852,802 | 139,836 |
| Downloads all time | 32.2 M | 673 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-11-27 | 2025-08-06 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 55 days (28 Jul – 20 Sep)
1.3 M18 K
sdxl-turbo
NetaYume-Lumina-Image-2.0
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
sdxl-turbo · fp16
46.7 GB / 24 GB
NetaYume-Lumina-Image-2.0 · fp16
99.5 GB / 24 GB