rorshark-vit-base vs vit-base-nsfw-detector
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
amunchet · A · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
860 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
AdamCodd · B · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
707 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | rorshark-vit-base | vit-base-nsfw-detector |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 90 M |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | ViTForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 859,746 | 707,190 |
| Downloads all time | 22.8 M | 24.8 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-11-18 | 2024-01-03 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
964 K625 K
rorshark-vit-base
vit-base-nsfw-detector
A overtook B on 10 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
rorshark-vit-base · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB
vit-base-nsfw-detector · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB