rorshark-vit-base vs nsfw_image_detector
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
amunchet · A · Open weights
Params
90 M
Context
—
30d
860 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | rorshark-vit-base | nsfw_image_detector |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 90 M | 90 M |
| Architecture | ViTForImageClassification | TimmWrapperForImageClassification |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 859,746 | 460,061 |
| Downloads all time | 22.8 M | 10.2 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-11-18 | 2025-04-10 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
914 K300 K
rorshark-vit-base
nsfw_image_detector
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
nsfw_image_detector · fp16
0.7 GB / 24 GB
rorshark-vit-base · fp16
0.9 GB / 24 GB