resnet50.a1_in1k vs convnext_small.fb_in22k_ft_in1k_384
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
timm · B · Open weights
Params
50 M
Context
—
30d
243 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | resnet50.a1_in1k | convnext_small.fb_in22k_ft_in1k_384 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 30 M | 50 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,446,623 | 242,623 |
| Downloads all time | 339.1 M | 977 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-04-05 | 2022-12-13 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
3.1 M206 K
resnet50.a1_in1k
convnext_small.fb_in22k_ft_in1k_384
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
resnet50.a1_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
convnext_small.fb_in22k_ft_in1k_384 · fp16
0.7 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs resnet50.a1_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs resnet50.a1_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs convnext_small.fb_in22k_ft_in1k_384
resnet50.a1_in1k vs Gender-Classifier-Mini
vit-base-patch16-224 vs convnext_small.fb_in22k_ft_in1k_384
resnet50.a1_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k