resnet18.a1_in1k vs vit_tiny_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
timm · B
Params
10 M
Context
—
30d
197 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | resnet18.a1_in1k | vit_tiny_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 10 M | 10 M |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 2,034,361 | 197,324 |
| Downloads all time | 79.5 M | 5.5 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2023-04-05 | 2022-12-22 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 56 days (28 Jul – 21 Sep)
2.0 M189 K
resnet18.a1_in1k
vit_tiny_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
vit_tiny_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k · fp16
0.5 GB / 24 GB
resnet18.a1_in1k · fp16
0.6 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs resnet18.a1_in1k
resnet18.a1_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
mobilenetv3_small_100.lamb_in1k vs vit_tiny_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k
vit_tiny_patch16_224.augreg_in21k_ft_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
resnet18.a1_in1k vs tf_efficientnetv2_s.in21k_ft_in1k
vit-base-patch16-224 vs resnet18.a1_in1k