Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-Coder-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 23 October 2026.
ISTA-DASLab · A · Open weights
Params
180.0 B
Context
—
30d
6.4 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
ISTA-DASLab · B · Open weights
Params
180.0 B
Context
—
30d
932 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-Coder-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 180.0 B | 180.0 B |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 6,443,555 | 932,301 |
| Downloads all time | 6.5 M | 932 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-26 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 22 days (2 Oct – 23 Oct)
6.4 M799 K
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-Coder-GGUF
Adjacent comparisons
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-iMatrix-NVFP4-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-abliterated-GGUF
gemma-4-31B-it vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF