Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B vs Ling 3.1 Flash

API pricing, benchmark indices and specs — updated 19 October 2026.

Qwen · A · Open weights
Params
2,446.2 B
Context
262,144
30d
25 K
inclusionai · B · API-only
Input / 1M
$0.075
Output / 1M
$0.23
AA index
41.1
proprietary · 262.1K context

Specification comparison

Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.

Specification Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B Ling 3.1 Flash
Deployment Open weights · also via API API-only (closed weights)
Parameters 2,446.2 B n/a — API-only
Architecture Qwen3_5MoeForCausalLM n/a — API-only
Context length 262,144 262,144
Licence other Proprietary
Commercial use Unknown Per API terms
Languages — n/a — API-only
Downloads 30d 24,938 n/a — API-only
Downloads all time 101 K n/a — API-only
Quantizations on the Hub SAFETENSORS n/a — API-only
Gated No n/a — API-only
First seen on the Hub 2026-08-08 n/a — API-only
API input price / 1M tokens $2.00 $0.075
API output price / 1M tokens $6.00 $0.23
Est. cost per 1M input + 1M output tokens $8.00 $0.30
Cached input / 1M tokens $0.25 $0.015
AA Intelligence Index 39.9 41.1
AA Coding Index 71.9 —
AA Agentic Index 50.1 —
Max output tokens 909,000 235,929
API providers 5 2
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes

API cost

Estimated cost of 1M input + 1M output tokens via OpenRouter

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B $8.00
Ling 3.1 Flash $0.30

Ling 3.1 Flash is 26.7× cheaper at list price.

VRAM side by side

On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted

Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · fp16 @ 256K ctx 17,123.8 GB / 24 GB
❌ Won’t fit

Adjacent comparisons