Qwen3.5-9B vs Kimi-K2.5

Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 28 July 2026.

Qwen · A · Open weights
Params
9.7 B
Context
—
30d
6.4 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
moonshotai · B · Open weights
Params
1,058.6 B
Context
—
30d
804 K

Specification comparison

Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.

Specification Qwen3.5-9B Kimi-K2.5
Deployment Open weights · also via API Open weights · also via API
Parameters 9.7 B 1,058.6 B
Architecture Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration KimiK25ForConditionalGeneration
Context length 262,144 256,000
Licence apache-2.0 other
Commercial use Allowed Unknown
Languages — —
Downloads 30d 6,366,157 803,810
Downloads all time 75.3 M 15.4 M
Quantizations on the Hub SAFETENSORS SAFETENSORS
Gated No No
First seen on the Hub 2026-02-27 2026-01-01
API input price / 1M tokens $0.17 $0.53
API output price / 1M tokens $0.25 $3.33
Est. cost per 1M input + 1M output tokens $0.42 $3.86
Cached input / 1M tokens — $0.21
AA Intelligence Index — —
AA Coding Index 28.7 46.8
AA Agentic Index 1.2 —
Max output tokens 235,929 65,536
API providers 6 5
Tool calling Yes Yes
Reasoning mode Yes Yes

API cost

Estimated cost of 1M input + 1M output tokens via OpenRouter

Qwen3.5-9B $0.42
Kimi-K2.5 $3.86

Qwen3.5-9B is 9.2× cheaper at list price.

Download trend

Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)

14.3 M804 K
Qwen3.5-9B Kimi-K2.5

VRAM side by side

On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted

Qwen3.5-9B · fp16 23.2 GB / 24 GB
⚠️ Tight — reduce context
Kimi-K2.5 · fp16 814.0 GB / 24 GB
❌ Won’t fit

Adjacent comparisons