Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 23 October 2026.
ISTA-DASLab · B · Open weights
Params
180.0 B
Context
—
30d
6.4 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | 180.0 B |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,345,195 | 6,443,555 |
| Downloads all time | 10.0 M | 6.5 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-02-28 | 2026-09-07 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 88 days (28 Jul – 23 Oct)
6.4 M952 K
Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF · Q4_0
6.4 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-iMatrix-NVFP4-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-abliterated-GGUF
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it vs Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF