Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs SDXL-Lightning
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
ByteDance · B · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
256 K
openrail++ licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF | SDXL-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 7.1 B | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | other | openrail++ |
| Commercial use | Unknown | Conditional |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 2,188,658 | 255,636 |
| Downloads all time | 2.2 M | 5.9 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF, SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-09-20 | 2024-02-20 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 49 days (23 Sep – 10 Nov)
2.2 M80 K
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
SDXL-Lightning
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF · Q4_0
6.1 GB / 24 GB
SDXL-Lightning · fp16
54.9 GB / 24 GB
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF · fp16
71.4 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
Qwen-Image-2.1 vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-Quantized
Krea-2 vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0 vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-GGUF
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Turbo-GGUF