Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 23 October 2026.
unsloth · B · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
112 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF | ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 7.1 B | — |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | other | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Unknown | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 2,188,658 | 111,892 |
| Downloads all time | 2.2 M | 290 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF, SAFETENSORS | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-09-20 | 2026-04-14 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 31 days (23 Sep – 23 Oct)
2.2 M34 K
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
ERNIE-Image-Turbo-GGUF · Q4_0
5.7 GB / 24 GB
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF · Q4_0
6.1 GB / 24 GB
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF · fp16
71.4 GB / 24 GB
Adjacent comparisons
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-Quantized
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-GGUF
stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0 vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
Z-Image-Turbo-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
Z-Image-Turbo vs Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF
Qwen-Image-2.1-Uncensored-GGUF vs Qwen-Image-2.1-viggle-turbo