Prompt-Guard-86M vs koelectra-polite-v1
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Prompt-Guard-86M | koelectra-polite-v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 280 M | — |
| Architecture | DebertaV2ForSequenceClassification | ElectraForSequenceClassification |
| Context length | — | 512 |
| Licence | llama3.1 | — |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Unknown |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 4,353,957 | 271,822 |
| Downloads all time | 18.1 M | 2.1 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | — |
| Gated | Yes — accept licence | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2024-07-21 | 2022-09-07 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 56 days (28 Jul – 21 Sep)
4.6 M272 K
Prompt-Guard-86M
koelectra-polite-v1
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Prompt-Guard-86M · fp16
1.8 GB / 24 GB