Prompt-Guard-86M vs ftrobertallm
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 October 2026.
meta-llama · A · Open weights
Params
280 M
Context
—
30d
2.4 M
llama3.1 licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Prompt-Guard-86M | ftrobertallm |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 280 M | 355 M |
| Architecture | DebertaV2ForSequenceClassification | RobertaForSequenceClassification |
| Context length | — | 512 |
| Licence | llama3.1 | mit |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 2,376,548 | 202,326 |
| Downloads all time | 20.8 M | 1.1 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | Yes — accept licence | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2024-07-21 | 2024-02-15 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 89 days (28 Jul – 24 Oct)
4.6 M202 K
Prompt-Guard-86M
ftrobertallm
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Prompt-Guard-86M · fp16
1.8 GB / 24 GB
ftrobertallm · fp16
2.1 GB / 24 GB