OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Vikhr-Nemo-12B-Instruct-R-21-09-24
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 21 September 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A
Params
31.3 B
Context
262,144
30d
6.6 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Vikhrmodels · B
Params
12.3 B
Context
1,024,000
30d
239 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | Vikhr-Nemo-12B-Instruct-R-21-09-24 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.3 B | 12.3 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | MistralForCausalLM |
| Context length | 262,144 | 1,024,000 |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | 2 |
| Downloads 30d | 6,581,143 | 238,906 |
| Downloads all time | 13.5 M | 3.3 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-07-23 | 2024-09-20 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 53 days (31 Jul – 21 Sep)
7.6 M239 K
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
Vikhr-Nemo-12B-Instruct-R-21-09-24
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Vikhr-Nemo-12B-Instruct-R-21-09-24 · fp16 @ 1000K ctx
258.6 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
290.0 GB / 24 GB