OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3-Coder-Next-FP8
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 28 September 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
31.3 B
Context
262,144
30d
720 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
unsloth · B · Open weights
Params
79.7 B
Context
262,144
30d
192 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | Qwen3-Coder-Next-FP8 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.3 B | 79.7 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | Qwen3NextForCausalLM |
| Context length | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 720,422 | 191,647 |
| Downloads all time | 14.2 M | 336 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-07-23 | 2026-02-03 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
7.6 M165 K
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
Qwen3-Coder-Next-FP8
A overtook B on 27 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
290.0 GB / 24 GB
Qwen3-Coder-Next-FP8 · fp16 @ 256K ctx
471.4 GB / 24 GB