OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Ornith-1.0-35B-FP8
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 30 September 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
31.3 B
Context
262,144
30d
720 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
protoLabsAI · B · Open weights
Params
35.1 B
Context
—
30d
193 K
mit · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | Ornith-1.0-35B-FP8 |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.3 B | 35.1 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | Qwen3_5MoeForConditionalGeneration |
| Context length | 262,144 | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 720,422 | 193,326 |
| Downloads all time | 14.2 M | 1.0 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-07-23 | 2026-06-27 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
7.6 M165 K
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
Ornith-1.0-35B-FP8
A overtook B on 27 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Ornith-1.0-35B-FP8 · fp16
47.1 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
290.0 GB / 24 GB