OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Meta-Llama-3-70B
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 19 August 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
31.3 B
Context
262,144
30d
720 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
meta-llama · B · Open weights
Params
70.6 B
Context
—
30d
136 K
llama3 licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | Meta-Llama-3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.3 B | 70.6 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | LlamaForCausalLM |
| Context length | 262,144 | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | llama3 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Conditional |
| Languages | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads 30d | 720,422 | 135,686 |
| Downloads all time | 14.2 M | 4.3 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | Yes — accept licence |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-07-23 | 2024-04-17 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
7.6 M132 K
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
Meta-Llama-3-70B
A overtook B on 27 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Meta-Llama-3-70B · fp16
166.3 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
290.0 GB / 24 GB