OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 7 September 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A
Params
31.3 B
Context
262,144
30d
6.3 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT | Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 31.3 B | 49.1 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | KimiLinearForCausalLM |
| Context length | 262,144 | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | mit |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 6,257,971 | 190,802 |
| Downloads all time | 13.5 M | 1.2 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-07-23 | 2025-10-30 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 54 days (31 Jul – 22 Sep)
7.6 M176 K
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct · fp16
115.9 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT · fp16 @ 256K ctx
290.0 GB / 24 GB