OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit vs Qwen3-Coder-Next-8bit

Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.

farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
25.8 B
Context
—
30d
3.2 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
NexVeridian · B · Open weights
Params
79.7 B
Context
262,144
30d
336 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK

Specification comparison

Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.

Specification OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit Qwen3-Coder-Next-8bit
Parameters 25.8 B 79.7 B
Architecture Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration Qwen3NextForCausalLM
Context length — 262,144
Licence apache-2.0 apache-2.0
Commercial use Allowed Allowed
Languages 1 —
Downloads 30d 3,246,291 336,073
Downloads all time 3.2 M 2.1 M
Quantizations on the Hub GGUF, SAFETENSORS SAFETENSORS
Gated No No
First seen on the Hub 2026-10-06 2026-02-03

Download trend

Daily snapshots, last 19 days (23 Oct – 10 Nov)

3.2 M139 K
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit Qwen3-Coder-Next-8bit

VRAM side by side

On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted

OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · Q4_K_M 22.8 GB / 24 GB
⚠️ Tight — reduce context
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · fp16 23.3 GB / 24 GB
⚠️ Tight — reduce context
Qwen3-Coder-Next-8bit · fp16 @ 256K ctx 476.1 GB / 24 GB
❌ Won’t fit

Adjacent comparisons