OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit vs POCKET-26B-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
25.8 B
Context
—
30d
3.2 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
FINAL-Bench · B · Open weights
Params
26.0 B
Context
—
30d
234 K
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit | POCKET-26B-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 25.8 B | 26.0 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | 1 | — |
| Downloads 30d | 3,246,291 | 234,467 |
| Downloads all time | 3.2 M | 924 K |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF, SAFETENSORS | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-10-06 | 2026-07-24 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 19 days (23 Oct – 10 Nov)
3.2 M186 K
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit
POCKET-26B-GGUF
A overtook B on 24 Oct
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · Q4_K_M
22.8 GB / 24 GB
POCKET-26B-GGUF · Q4_K_M
22.9 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · fp16
23.3 GB / 24 GB