OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit vs NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-FP8

Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.

farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
25.8 B
Context
—
30d
3.2 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
RedHatAI · B · Open weights
Params
31.6 B
Context
262,144
30d
820 K

Specification comparison

Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.

Specification OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-FP8
Parameters 25.8 B 31.6 B
Architecture Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration NemotronHForCausalLM
Context length — 262,144
Licence apache-2.0 —
Commercial use Allowed Unknown
Languages 1 —
Downloads 30d 3,246,291 820,287
Downloads all time 3.2 M 1.9 M
Quantizations on the Hub GGUF, SAFETENSORS SAFETENSORS
Gated No No
First seen on the Hub 2026-10-06 2026-08-13

Download trend

Daily snapshots, last 19 days (23 Oct – 10 Nov)

3.2 M220 K
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-FP8 A overtook B on 28 Oct

VRAM side by side

On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted

OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · Q4_K_M 22.8 GB / 24 GB
⚠️ Tight — reduce context
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · fp16 23.3 GB / 24 GB
⚠️ Tight — reduce context
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-FP8 · fp16 @ 256K ctx 187.6 GB / 24 GB
❌ Won’t fit

Adjacent comparisons