OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit vs Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-FP8

Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.

farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
25.8 B
Context
—
30d
3.2 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
RedHatAI · B · Open weights
Params
70.6 B
Context
131,072
30d
142 K
llama3.1 licence · conditional

Specification comparison

Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.

Specification OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-FP8
Parameters 25.8 B 70.6 B
Architecture Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration LlamaForCausalLM
Context length — 131,072
Licence apache-2.0 llama3.1
Commercial use Allowed Conditional
Languages 1 8
Downloads 30d 3,246,291 141,993
Downloads all time 3.2 M 2.1 M
Quantizations on the Hub GGUF, SAFETENSORS SAFETENSORS
Gated No No
First seen on the Hub 2026-10-06 2024-07-23

Download trend

Daily snapshots, last 19 days (23 Oct – 10 Nov)

3.2 M139 K
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-FP8

VRAM side by side

On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted

OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · Q4_K_M 22.8 GB / 24 GB
⚠️ Tight — reduce context
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · fp16 23.3 GB / 24 GB
⚠️ Tight — reduce context
Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct-FP8 · fp16 @ 128K ctx 249.8 GB / 24 GB
❌ Won’t fit

Adjacent comparisons