OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit vs LFM2-24B-A2B-MLX-8bit
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
farbodtavakkoli · A · Open weights
Params
25.8 B
Context
—
30d
3.2 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit | LFM2-24B-A2B-MLX-8bit |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 25.8 B | 23.8 B |
| Architecture | Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration | Lfm2MoeForCausalLM |
| Context length | — | 128,000 |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | other |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Unknown |
| Languages | 1 | 9 |
| Downloads 30d | 3,246,291 | 149,102 |
| Downloads all time | 3.2 M | 2.0 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF, SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-10-06 | 2026-02-23 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 19 days (23 Oct – 10 Nov)
3.2 M139 K
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit
LFM2-24B-A2B-MLX-8bit
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · Q4_K_M
22.8 GB / 24 GB
OTel-2.0-Decision-26B-A4B-4bit · fp16
23.3 GB / 24 GB
LFM2-24B-A2B-MLX-8bit · fp16 @ 125K ctx
84.3 GB / 24 GB