Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 10 November 2026.
unsloth · A · Open weights
Params
—
Context
—
30d
1.1 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
ISTA-DASLab · B · Open weights
Params
180.0 B
Context
—
30d
6.8 M
apache-2.0 · commercial OK
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | — | 180.0 B |
| Architecture | — | — |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Commercial use | Allowed | Allowed |
| Languages | — | — |
| Downloads 30d | 1,075,366 | 6,843,896 |
| Downloads all time | 1.1 M | 11.0 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | GGUF | GGUF |
| Gated | No | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2026-08-10 | 2026-09-07 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 83 days (20 Aug – 10 Nov)
7.8 M819 K
Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Adjacent comparisons
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-abliterated-GGUF
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-iMatrix-NVFP4-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-HauhauCS-Aggressive-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-MTP-GGUF vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-GSQ-RCO-GGUF