Llama-3.2-1B vs bloomz-560m
Specs, VRAM requirements and download trends — updated 24 August 2026.
meta-llama · A · Open weights
Params
1.2 B
Context
—
30d
477 K
llama3.2 licence · conditional
bigscience · B · Open weights
Params
560 M
Context
—
30d
599 K
bigscience-bloom-rail-1.0 licence · conditional
Specification comparison
Differences are highlighted; identical values are muted.
| Specification | Llama-3.2-1B | bloomz-560m |
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | 1.2 B | 560 M |
| Architecture | LlamaForCausalLM | BloomForCausalLM |
| Context length | — | — |
| Licence | llama3.2 | bigscience-bloom-rail-1.0 |
| Commercial use | Conditional | Conditional |
| Languages | 8 | 46 |
| Downloads 30d | 477,238 | 599,299 |
| Downloads all time | 60.2 M | 63.2 M |
| Quantizations on the Hub | SAFETENSORS | SAFETENSORS |
| Gated | Yes — accept licence | No |
| First seen on the Hub | 2024-09-18 | 2022-10-08 |
Download trend
Daily snapshots, last 90 days (13 Aug – 10 Nov)
1.8 M432 K
Llama-3.2-1B
bloomz-560m
VRAM side by side
On RTX 4090 · 24 GB · 8K context unless noted
bloomz-560m · fp16
1.8 GB / 24 GB
Llama-3.2-1B · fp16
3.4 GB / 24 GB